<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fair Use Explained: More on Copyrighted Images on Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/</link>
	<description>Stylish &#38; Savvy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrenDee</title>
		<link>http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-25083</link>
		<dc:creator>TrenDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 02:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentfashionbloggers.org/?p=885#comment-25083</guid>
		<description>Hi Jennine,

Thanks heaps for this informative post.

I have a question:

YOU WROTE: &quot;Bloggers often make commentaries on images, saying ‘this is what I think about this trend…’&quot;

Would this be considered commenting on the subject (person wearing trendy clothes) within the copyrighted work (image/photography) but not necessarily commenting on the work itself (for example, &#039;great shot, but not enough lighting...&#039;)? In which case do we still have a fair use defence?

Thanks in advance,

TrenDee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennine,</p>
<p>Thanks heaps for this informative post.</p>
<p>I have a question:</p>
<p>YOU WROTE: &#8220;Bloggers often make commentaries on images, saying ‘this is what I think about this trend…’&#8221;</p>
<p>Would this be considered commenting on the subject (person wearing trendy clothes) within the copyrighted work (image/photography) but not necessarily commenting on the work itself (for example, &#8216;great shot, but not enough lighting&#8230;&#8217;)? In which case do we still have a fair use defence?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,</p>
<p>TrenDee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crediting Artists &#124; Katie Gould Photography</title>
		<link>http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-20049</link>
		<dc:creator>Crediting Artists &#124; Katie Gould Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentfashionbloggers.org/?p=885#comment-20049</guid>
		<description>[...] If they blogged my image then discussed it, it would then be transformed and probably considered fair use. http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If they blogged my image then discussed it, it would then be transformed and probably considered fair use. <a href="http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/" rel="nofollow">http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen Philipkoski</title>
		<link>http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-15442</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen Philipkoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentfashionbloggers.org/?p=885#comment-15442</guid>
		<description>You wote: &quot;The use of copyrighted images is so commonplace, when I was at London Fashion week a few designers told me  to use images of their fall collections on Style.com (not to name any names outright, but I’ll give you a hint, I’m using the pic via style.com above)… even though the disclaimer on the site says:
‘The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of CondéNet, Inc.’
Talk about mixed messages!&quot;

This is not really a mixed message, it&#039;s two messages coming from different sources. Designers telling you to lift photos from Style.com might not know a thing about copyright law, and they likely have no influence over what Conde Nast&#039;s policies or decisions regarding litigatin. The Style.com disclaimer is the message from Conde Nast regarding how they feel about people using their content. That said, bloggers may well be protected by fair use. But as you said, judges decide on a case by case bases what constitutes infringement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wote: &#8220;The use of copyrighted images is so commonplace, when I was at London Fashion week a few designers told me  to use images of their fall collections on Style.com (not to name any names outright, but I’ll give you a hint, I’m using the pic via style.com above)… even though the disclaimer on the site says:<br />
‘The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of CondéNet, Inc.’<br />
Talk about mixed messages!&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not really a mixed message, it&#8217;s two messages coming from different sources. Designers telling you to lift photos from Style.com might not know a thing about copyright law, and they likely have no influence over what Conde Nast&#8217;s policies or decisions regarding litigatin. The Style.com disclaimer is the message from Conde Nast regarding how they feel about people using their content. That said, bloggers may well be protected by fair use. But as you said, judges decide on a case by case bases what constitutes infringement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: affordable stock images pilippines</title>
		<link>http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-10759</link>
		<dc:creator>affordable stock images pilippines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentfashionbloggers.org/?p=885#comment-10759</guid>
		<description>Ahw..thats is so ridiculous. Nasty tactics and vulnerable one. Sorry Sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahw..thats is so ridiculous. Nasty tactics and vulnerable one. Sorry Sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://heartifb.com/2009/03/30/fair-use-explained-more-on-copyrighted-images-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-6623</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentfashionbloggers.org/?p=885#comment-6623</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this article. It has inspired me to be more careful and make sure to site my stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this article. It has inspired me to be more careful and make sure to site my stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

