<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions, Ranking&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heartifb.com/2007/10/29/questions-ranking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heartifb.com/2007/10/29/questions-ranking/</link>
	<description>Stylish &#38; Savvy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:26:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cDVDs.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://heartifb.com/2007/10/29/questions-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>cDVDs.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independentfashionbloggers.org/wordpress/?p=24#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I think the recent update is an excellent step to banishing the poor quality / spammy sites from the index and keeping webmasters on their toes to include quality content on their sites and think of the user.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Google is being very clear with its Pagerank algorithm, and whilst a ranking is not indicative of traffic, it is still something to aspire to, and shows us if we are doing a good thing with our websites.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I recently commented that getting higher up in the rankings should be the result of hard work in creating a quality and useful resource for other web users as opposed to simply &#039;paying for links&#039; to get to the top.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Love live Pagerank.... and we&#039;ve just jumped up 3 places! woo hoo!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Si&lt;br/&gt;http://www.cdvds.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the recent update is an excellent step to banishing the poor quality / spammy sites from the index and keeping webmasters on their toes to include quality content on their sites and think of the user.</p>
<p>Google is being very clear with its Pagerank algorithm, and whilst a ranking is not indicative of traffic, it is still something to aspire to, and shows us if we are doing a good thing with our websites.</p>
<p>I recently commented that getting higher up in the rankings should be the result of hard work in creating a quality and useful resource for other web users as opposed to simply &#8216;paying for links&#8217; to get to the top.</p>
<p>Love live Pagerank&#8230;. and we&#8217;ve just jumped up 3 places! woo hoo!</p>
<p>Si<br /><a href="http://www.cdvds.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdvds.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

